Some more small editing

This commit is contained in:
Aspasia Beneti 2019-01-17 16:05:28 +01:00
parent 11f46e2b95
commit 221035eb4e
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

6
MCL.md
View File

@ -26,14 +26,14 @@ Indeed, business communities are getting more and more aware about the topics an
## 1. Editorial guidelines
These editorial guidelines are here to provide all partners and involved participants with the essential information that needs to be distributed in all the stages of the duration of the LEDGER project as well as after the closing of the project in order. In the following paragraphs, the content creation, internal validation, as well as the distribution and evaluation of impact is analysed and exposed and the necessary workflow is drafted.
These editorial guidelines are meant to provide all partners and involved participants with the essential information that needs to be distributed in all stages of the LEDGER project as well as after the closing of the project. In the following paragraphs, the content creation, internal validation, as well as the distribution and evaluation of the impact is analysed and exposed and the necessary workflow is drafted.
All content should attract participants to both Open Calls of the project. It should clearly express the characteristics, ethos and values of the Ledger project and it should be available for change so that it can reflect the evolution of the project in all itearations during its 3 years duration. The MarCom of the project shall equally promote and document the development of the project through the sum of the participants work, the evolution of the technologies and the progress being made in each vertical. Content distribution tactics and special needs are as well hinted. `aspra: dont understand last sentence, suggest deletion`
These editorial guidelines will also be visible to the participants. However it is expected that close monitoring of the communication spaces and some re-iterations of editing will be necessary in time by the Dyne.org communication team and to be validated through pair review between partners.
These editorial guidelines will also be visible to the participants. However, it is expected that close monitoring of the communication spaces and some re-iterations of editing will be necessary by the Dyne.org communication team and they will need to be validated through pair review between partners.
Moreover, this document is in place to ensure the best possible compliance with timelines and guidlines; in particular:
- The LEDGER project consortium partners will be informed specifically about the timelines in the project where they are expected to provide with promotional material and other communications content.
- The LEDGER project consortium partners will be informed specifically about the timelines in the project when they are expected to provide with promotional material and other communications content.
- The Consortium partners in charge of organizing events and bootcamps as previously agreed on, will be instructed to provide access to other partners and collaborators in order to faciliate the creation of video documentation and other produced content both for external and internal communication and documentation.
## 2. Structure of the materials and creation workflow