LEDGER
/
Communication
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests 1 Releases Wiki Activity

Changes regarding shortening of intro/preface and additions to the software dev part #1

Open
aspra wants to merge 4 commits from marcom-aspra into master
pull from: marcom-aspra
merge into: LEDGER:master
Conversation 0 Commits 4 Files Changed 1 +21 -20
1 changed files with 21 additions and 20 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
Showing only changes of commit 0a62586adc - Show all commits

41
MCL.md
View File

@ -6,39 +6,32 @@ gitea: https://gitea.dyne.org/LEDGER/Communication
## INTRODUCTION/VISION-VIEW ## INTRODUCTION/VISION-VIEW
In terms of Marketing and Communication Strategy (MarCom hereafter), LEDGER can be thought of as an 'attractor' involving four main communities froming LEDGER's community of communities: citizens and consumers, developers, policymakers and business communities together with all the stakeholders populating these networks. In effect, it would be pretty farfetched to argue that LEDGER can become a game changer in the market without the contribution of these communities and related stakeholders bases. Therefore, special emphasis will be put on how to engage such parties. Given the resources and timespan of the project, the latter are fundamental to effectively contribute to the marketing, communication and dissemination of LEDGER’s values as emerging from the Strategic Research and Innovation Work Programme and the descending business value proposition. In terms of Marketing and Communication Strategy (MarCom hereafter), LEDGER can be thought of as an 'attractor' involving four main communities forming LEDGER's community of communities: citizens and consumers, software developers, policymakers and business communities `I am not sure if I understand what business communities are. An example?` together with all the stakeholders populating these networks. LEDGER can become a game changer in the market only with the contribution of these communities and their stakeholders. Therefore, special emphasis will be put on how to engage such parties. Given the resources and timespan of the project, the latter are fundamental to effectively contribute to the marketing, communication and dissemination of LEDGER’s values as emerging from the Strategic Research and Innovation Work Programme and the descending business value proposition.
Contrary to most Push Marketing practices endorsed in the conventional market place, LEDGER’s MarCom strategy shall aim at pulling in and securing the involvement of the proper parties, i.e. those who can understand and appreciate LEDGER’s ethos values and business value proposition. Unlike most Push Marketing practices endorsed in the conventional market place, LEDGER’s MarCom strategy shall aim at pulling in and securing the involvement of the proper parties, i.e. those who can understand and appreciate LEDGER’s ethos values and business value proposition. Such Pull Marketing practices and techniques will be rolled out thanks to the dissemination of project's deliverables within the four communities, and related stakeholders bases as mentioned above. In particular, LEDGER as an attractor is a dynamic process in which these four communities, and related stakeholders, will converge over time to provide a space for direct engagement and production of optimal exploitation strategies around the LEDGER outcomes.
Pull Marketing practices and techniques will be rolled out thanks to the dissemination of project's deliverables within the four communities, and related stakeholders bases, mentioned above. In particular, LEDGER as an attractor is a dynamic process in which these four communities, and related stakeholders, will converge over time to provide a space for direct engagement and production of optimal exploitation strategies around LEDGER outcomes. Marketing activities will be organised at the light of the marketability needs of each vertical in order to promote a collaborative economy framework wherein each contributing party will acknowledge a direct and impactful engagement. Each vertical framework will leverage both the network outreach capabilities of evaluators and mentors. Moreover, marketing will be strictly intertwined with following the trail of dissemination activities in order to underpin MVPs with real world communities and meeting their real needs.
Marketing activities will be organised at the light of the marketability needs of each vertical in order to promote a collaborative economy framework wherein each contributing party will acknowledge a direct and impactful engagement. Indeed, in the SRI Work Programme deliverable we have covered a wide range of results that all confirm that there is a need for both software development and business models that take into account the non-neutrality of digital infrastructures in the enhancement of their respective narratives. In this context, non-neutrality results from the interaction of academic, policy, development and market forces, still promoting practices and techniques to achieve short-term thinking, compulsory growth, increased income disparity and decline in social capital. In this context it is important to remind that all `what all refers to here?` affect each of these communities.
Each vertical framework will leverage both the network outreach capabilities of evaluators and mentors. Moreover, marketing will be strictly intertwined with following the trail of dissemination activities in order to underpin MVPs with real world communities and meeting their real needs. These factors contribute to the inability of the four communities to have a common voice that advocates an emancipatory agenda in order to liberate them from the shortsighted constraints mentioned above. By contrast, when it comes to the advantages for citizens and consumers together with policy and business sectors’ awareness of the importance to serve society with their endeavours, LEDGER aims at promoting open source models that take into account sustainable growth for the social good.
Indeed, in the SRI Work Programme deliverable we have covered a wide range of results that all confirm that there is a need for both software development and business models that take into account the non-neutrality of digital infrastructures in the enhancement of their respective narratives. Accordingly, the MarCom strategy will be addressed to these communities as they make the overall perimeter of the initial LEDGER impact. The driving force will be the firm determination by the consortium to achieve successful outreach within all the four communities listed above. Successful outreach is measured to the extent to which LEDGER’s decentralised development ecosystems can be appealing to the citizens and operators working to let them meet their needs and desires in terms of decentralised data governance.
In this context, non-neutrality results from the interaction of academic, policy, development and market forces, still promoting practices and techniques to achieve short-term thinking, compulsory growth, increased income disparity and decline in social capital. In this context it is important to remind that all affect each of these communities.
These factors contribute to the inability for the four communities to have a common voice to advocate an emancipatory agenda to liberate them from the shortsighted constraints mentioned above. By contrast, when it comes to the advantages for citizens and consumers together with policy and business sectors’ awareness of the importance to serve society with their endeavours, LEDGER aims at promoting open source models that take into account sustainable growth for the social good.
Accordingly, the MarCom strategy will be addressed to these communities as they make the overall perimeter of initial LEDGER impact. The driving force will be the firm determination by the consortium to achieve successful outreach within all the four communities listed above. Successful outreach is measured to the extent to which LEDGER’s decentralised development ecosystems can be appealing to the citizens and operators working to let them meet their needs and desires in terms of decentralised data governance.
`I find this section too verbose and that it doesnt address clearly that we want to be explicitely inclusive i.e. reach out diverse communities`
### CITIZENS AND CONSUMERS ### CITIZENS AND CONSUMERS
First, citizens and consumers communities are confronted with issues that too often do not account for the ‘negotiable divide’ impelling onto them. Both policymakers and business communities are not always in tune with the needs of citizens and consumers in that the latter have to account for market dynamics that do not allow to take care of the problems affecting the former. First, citizen and consumer communities are confronted with issues that too often do not account for the ‘negotiable divide’ impelling onto them. Both policymakers and business communities are not always in tune with the needs of citizens and consumers in that the latter have to account for market dynamics that do not allow them to take care of the problems affecting the former. `so the citizents and consumers have to take care of the problems of policy makers and businesses?` I dont understand these sentences`
With LEDGER, both marketing and communication strategies will need to account for this lack of presence from the poles that affect them the most in their potential for choices that would empower and assist them in re-appropriating the socio-economic outcomes of the data and value belonging to them. With LEDGER, both marketing and communication strategies will need to account for this lack of presence from the poles that affect them the most in their potential for choices that would empower and assist them in re-appropriating the socio-economic outcomes of the data and value belonging to them. Hence, citizens and consumers will be endowed with knowledge and tools to face the negotiable divide in order to let them have a voice in the process of emancipation from socio-economic models that do not serve their needs and desires.
Hence, citizens and consumers will be endowed with knowledge and tools to face the negotiable divide in order to let them have a voice in the process of emancipation from socio-economic models that do not serve their needs and desires.
From a better understanding of both rights and duties of e-citizenry and e-commerce practices to the possibility to engage with LEDGER’s online communication platforms, both citizens and consumers will find ways, through social media and real world channels, to take part to the conversation affecting their ability to bargain for the kind of services that they purposefully aspire to enjoy as a right or to buy from the market. From a better understanding of both rights and duties of e-citizenry and e-commerce practices to the possibility to engage with LEDGER’s online communication platforms, both citizens and consumers will find ways, through social media and real world channels, to take part to the conversation affecting their ability to bargain for the kind of services that they purposefully aspire to enjoy as a right or to buy from the market.
### DEVELOPERS ### SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS
Secondly, developers will be periodically informed about the state of the software stack developed within LEDGER from LEDGER GitHub’s channels (LINK TO LEDEGR GITHUM AS FOR T1.6 STATED IN THE THE PROPOSAL). by leveraging on community dynamics, they will have the possibility to further influence the direction of development and will be heard in terms of their needs when they relate to how decentralised data governance should grow within the different vertical use cases. Secondly, software developers will be periodically informed about the state of the software stack developed within LEDGER from LEDGER GitHub’s channels (LINK TO LEDEGR GITHUM AS FOR T1.6 STATED IN THE THE PROPOSAL). By leveraging on community dynamics, they will have the possibility to further influence the direction of development and will be heard in terms of their needs when they relate to how decentralised data governance should grow within the different vertical use cases.
PLEASE ASPASIA AND JARO CONTRIBUTE TO THIS (Secondly) PLEASE ASPASIA AND JARO CONTRIBUTE TO THIS (Secondly)
@ -135,10 +128,10 @@ General communication groups are represented in this diagram. Access is readable
![Internalcommunications.png](./images/InternalCommunication.png) ![Internalcommunications.png](./images/InternalCommunication.png)
`In this diagram I dont see where the participants actually are. Also the color assigned to them is not present in diagram`
### 3.1. Brand (/Communication/1.Brand) ### 3.1. Brand (/Communication/1.Brand)
LEDGER project has to be integrated into NGI brand guidelines and has to be divagated in the contexts created by NGI. At the same time the communication aim of LEDGER wants to outreach to communities of FLOSS developers and more marginal communities that might be alienated by the language, both visual and in other ways narrative of a traditional campaign. This document aims to be a guide that includes this perspective. LEDGER project has to be integrated into NGI brand guidelines `ref??` and has to be divagated in the contexts created by NGI. At the same time the communication aim of LEDGER wants to outreach to communities of FLOSS developers and more marginal communities that might be alienated by the language, both visual and in other ways narrative of a traditional campaign. This document aims to be a guide that includes this perspective.
#### 3.1.1. brand book for LEDGER project #### 3.1.1. brand book for LEDGER project
A Brand book is a very good tool for general communication. It can evolve from the coordinate communication already studied for Ledger Project. A Brand book is a very good tool for general communication. It can evolve from the coordinate communication already studied for Ledger Project.
@ -353,15 +346,18 @@ Here a selection of the materials of the participants: names and logos, short pi
### 6.3. The Mentors ### 6.3. The Mentors
- list of mentors with cv, short pitch - list of mentors with cv, short pitch
### 6.4. Board and Jury ### 6.4. Board and Jury
- all informations necessary to identify the board and jury - all informations necessary to identify the board and jury
## 7. Distributors ## 7. Distributors
- Web site - Web site
- Founding Box Community - Founding Box Community
- Dyne.org community (???)
- Social - Social
### 7.1. Sharers and influencers ### 7.1. Sharers and influencers
- Dyne.org community (???)
- Founding Box Community - Founding Box Community
- Influencer List (special list) - Influencer List (special list)
- Internal mailinglist - Internal mailinglist
@ -372,14 +368,19 @@ How to treat press in events, in press releases, modules and templates
### 7.3. NGI communication and other Public channels of EU ### 7.3. NGI communication and other Public channels of EU
Overview and guidelines Overview and guidelines
`missing content`
### 7.4. FoundingBox social network and communities ### 7.4. FoundingBox social network and communities
In dept guideline for partners on how to use FoundingBox app In dept guideline for partners on how to use FoundingBox app
`missing content`
### 7.5. Social Media ### 7.5. Social Media
twitter network and hashtag guideline twitter network and hashtag guideline
system of retweet and how it has to work system of retweet and how it has to work
Other social Network Hashtag policies Other social Network Hashtag policies
`why only twitter? Maybe we can employ and promote also newer SN like scuttlebutt. How about FB? How about grassroot local like squatradar in Amsterdam?`
`missing content`
## 8. Metrics ## 8. Metrics
How do we measure the impact of our communication, how do we keep track of it and how and when do we correct the range of our communication narratives on this project? How do we measure the impact of our communication, how do we keep track of it and how and when do we correct the range of our communication narratives on this project?
`missing content`